Wall Street be damned, Hershey Co. is sticking by its theory that
in-store marketing and promotion works better than advertising. Despite a slew of questions from analysts suggesting a link between the
chocolate giant's recent decrease in ad spending and its
lower-than-expected third-quarter sales, Hershey President-CEO Rick
Lenny was adamant that Hershey's increase in consumer marketing next
year will happen "closest to the point of consumption." Translation: in
store.
Lift around anniversary
Hershey's measured media spending fell from $147 million in 2004 to
$122 million in 2005 and was $76 million for the first half of this
year, according to TNS Media Intelligence. And, according to Mr. Lenny,
those numbers are unlikely to go up in 2007 aside from a lift in
spending on the Kisses brand to celebrate its 100th anniversary.
Hershey spent $8 million on Kisses during January through June of this
year, TNS reported.
"Marketing-mix modeling still reinforces that trade [spending] has the
highest level of return on investment and then within consumer support
... those [efforts] closer to the point of consumption and
point-of-sale tend to have the higher return," Mr. Lenny said in a
conference call with analysts. In general, he said, Hershey uses
advertising to create awareness for new brands and new platforms, but
views in-store support -- whether through sampling or through
activities tied in with retailers' own strategies -- as the best way to
capitalize on those high-return investments.
Analysts are concerned that Hershey might be trapped in the
food industry's "cycle of doom," in which ad spending is cut to make
the numbers, then restored when sales fall, and then cut again.
Analysts also worry that the marketer's lack of advertising might
potentially be hurting the category overall. Mr. Lenny defended his
strategy by pointing to the success Hershey has had gaining share over
many previous quarters.
Not convincing enough
But he didn't quite convince investors. Though he said it's "hard to
overly criticize Hershey given they've had such a good 3- to 4-year
record," Prudential Securities analyst John McMillin believes ad
reductions may have contributed to the company's recent slowdown.
"Clearly chocolate is an impulse item but, at the end of the day, if
you don't advertise, you die."
Though far from "dying," Hershey's overall sales for the third quarter
grew only 3.3% compared to the 6% growth Hershey had led Wall Street
analysts to expect. And its share of the chocolate market declined, a
problem some analysts attribute to Hershey's decision to back away from
its limited-edition strategy earlier this year. According to A.C.
Nielsen data, Mars gained 3% in dollar share from Hershey over the four
weeks ended Oct. 7, as Hershey saw sales fall 5% to $133 million and
Mars' sales grew 14.5% to $99 million.
As an explanation, Mr. Lenny said "we erred in terms of not
having the typically strong consumer and customer programming," and he
outlined a plan to increase activity. Not surprisingly, media will not
be a major part of the initiative. Among the efforts are sampling,
which will increase dramatically during the fourth quarter, and a
fully-integrated program against its dark chocolate offerings on Black
Friday -- the day after Thanksgiving that is typically the biggest
shopping day of the year. The Black Friday push includes sampling,
targeted print ads and coupons. Programs with retail trade will also be
increased, he said, though those will not be price-discounting programs
-- which Mr. Lenny said "do not drive category growth" -- but rather
brand-building initiatives coordinated with retailers.
Outspent by $120 million
And Hershey is putting little
emphasis on advertising to build existing brands. While new Kissables
got $18 million for the first half of this year and new Reese's Cookies
got $7 million, the base Hershey bar received only $2.5 million in
spending and base brand Reese's got only $200,000, according to TNS.
Contrast that with rival Mars, which outspent Hershey by roughly $120
million in 2005. Despite outlays on newer brands and brand extensions,
the company continued to support its bread-and-butter brands, spending
more than $30 million on M&M's and $31 million on Snickers.
Hershey's agencies are Havas' Arnold, New York, and North Castle Partners, Stamford, Conn.
Spending only on new products, however, can be dangerous, especially if
the innovation doesn't catch on with consumers. While Credit Suisse
analyst David Nelson pointed out that "Hershey does have a strong track
record of innovation," he added that many of the initiatives Hershey
outlined to analysts last December "just didn't seem to pan out this
year."
(Source: Advertising adge)
|