Trang chính arrow News & Articles arrow What We Should Learn From Sony's Fake Blog Fiasco
What We Should Learn From Sony's Fake Blog Fiasco PDF Print E-mail
Written by Webmaster   
Sunday, 24 December 2006
 Sony and agency Zipatoni have come under fire for one of their marketing tactics for the Sony PSP. Sony has added its name to a growing list of flogs [fake blogs] including McDonald's, WalMart and Lonely Girl 15, that are being called out by consumers. This isn't the first time Sony has been caught and questioned about the ethics of its marketing practices.  Back in December of 2005, the brand came under fire for a graffiti tactic  that was used as a disguise for its marketing efforts. Neighborhoods spoke out against the company for using what some consider vandalism to sell a product and graffiti artists cried foul for "duping" people passing by.

This time the wrath comes from a blog titled alliwantforxmasisapsp.com (which has apparently been taken down by Sony) that featured two guys trying to spread the word about convincing family members to get one of them a PSP for Christmas. Except the whole thing wasn't really a blog -- a fact revealed by cyber sleuths who looked up the domain's registration
Sony's fake PSP blog effort appears to have backfired on the marketer -- and provided an important lesson for other marketers and their ad agencies.
Sony's fake PSP blog effort appears to have backfired on the marketer -- and provided an important lesson for other marketers and their ad agencies.

file. It was all just an advertising ploy. Once this news broke, it only took a matter of hours for the word to spread and the rapid fire comments and responses began.

I'm sure the one thing Sony did NOT expect was the amount of active bashing of the brand [and the site] that has virally spread over every gaming site and marketing blog out there. Top gaming site Penny Arcade had this to say,

"Unwilling to let an increasingly savvy portfolio of titles speak to gamers directly, they chose instead to bring aboard guerilla marketing gurus Zipatoni to do irreparable damage to their brand."

The article goes on:

"The reality is that no agency can create viral marketing, this is the sole domain of the consumer. Viral marketing is what happens when a campaign works -- when we allow their message to travel via our own super efficient conduits. Perhaps it is entertaining on its own terms, divorced from the message. Perhaps it is a game or a story, like I Love Bees or other ARGs, where we take ownership in it. What distinguishes this from Guerilla Marketing is that we are aware of the message. When we are not aware of the message, or when the agents of the message misrepresent themselves, we call this "deception."

The increasing debate over false and dishonorable marketing practices was further heightened last week when the FTC in Washington weighed in for the first time on the ethical practices of word-of-mouth tactics in marketing and moved to suggest that companies or endorsers clearly disclose when they're working together. The move was an important symbol of just what consumers will [or will not] accept in terms of being marketed to.

The lesson learned in this debacle for small agencies like us is not so much about covering your tracks when creating alternative marketing but something much bigger;

1] Good advertising doesn't rely on tricking, lying to or deceiving your target audience.

2] The consumer is smarter than you think, alternative marketing tactics must be genuine, authentic and in today's world, transparent.

3] Today's interest in brand politics means that everything you do will come under scrutiny from someone. See number 2.

4] Involve your consumer in the brand conversation, give them the tools to do so and they will repay you four-fold.

Today's audience might forgive you once, but make the same mistake twice and many will hold the brand and company accountable for the mistakes other's make.

Posted by Noelle Weaver on 12.18.06 @ 06:54 AM | 8 comments:

Comments

The "modern ways" of brand promotion are well defined in the Sony/Zipatoni saga. If this represents what's hot, I'm glad I retired from the game while there was still a semblance of pride and honesty. Just read the content of the Zipatoni web site to get a feel for their attitude toward the limits of good taste and propagating deceit. If it works - it's great - and we're great! Or did I misinterpret their meaning? –Tom Lang, Leslie, MO
For lack of a better outlet, and perhaps some apathy towards taking time to create my own personal (and ignorable) blog, let us come together and use this forum to discuss an issue that has laughably been blown out of proportion by our dollar-hungry corporate charges, and sadly, our own corporate ad-culture. It is time to discuss the absurdity of User-Generated content and the oxymoronic wild-goose chase of 'building' Viral & Guerilla culture content. Clients come to us looking for input and professional advice. Why? Because we are 'cool' and supposed to know more about consumers than they do. How then do mistakes as large as Zipatoni's attempts at creating a Christmas blog for Sony happen? Over and over again mistakes like Zipatoni's are being made. Someone didn't do their research, and they definitely didn't know what was cool. That's why some marketing makes it and some doesn't. First of all, these clients and agencies need to get off of the band wagon. Ask any coolhunter and they'll tell you that MySpace and YouTube were exploited and nearly dead long before ol' Rupert decided it had 'potential'. In many cases it is a waste of time and money putting ads up on YouTube and MySpace where the kids are more interested in what band is 'hot' and which girl has the cutest picture. YouTube is a place where all the mouse-potatoes go to waste a lazy Saturday away, finding something funny to look at. Look at the influential people ahead of the culture curve, they are still there alright, writing blogs and friending eachother - they built the place. But the second an advertiser comes fumbling around in the dark trying to mimick the 'cool' kid, the lights go on, the music shuts off, and the kids scatter like roaches into the dark. They'll just move on and write a new blog, start a new website, or drop the Internet all together because it got lame. In Sony's case, they made the stupid mistake of trying to fool the guys who were writing code 9-5, playing vids from 7-12, and writing blogs on the weekend. I can just imagine the disgust on Petey-Programmers face when Sony/Zipatoni sent him a polite request to link off of his blog. Way to go guys, in politics they would say that you have just alienated your base. In sales they would call you an idiot. In the desperate scramble to maintain an audience and deliver a decent ROI, everyone is hemorrhaging cash trying to catch up to fads. Newsflash: we are about 2 years too late. It's funny to see every Tom, Dick, and Harry in advertising gushing over CPB's 'magic potion', and how everything they touch seems to turn into viral-gold. They did the one thing any advertiser in his/her right mind should do - they make good creative. Sorry CPB, I didn't mean to spill the beans and spoil your secret. They've got great creatives and it's my guess they've got even better Account teams - who are pushy in the boardroom and ballsy enough to tell marketing VPs that pop culture has changed in the last decade. I'm guessing that they do their research, watch the culture curve extremely closely, and give their creatives the opportunity not to follow, but to lead. So here we go, Pop Quiz: What are YouTube and blogs, and why are they so popular? Any guesses? Okay, lets make it easy. YouTube is not about User-Generated material, it's about free distribution, and so is every blog out there. Common sense, right? I'm sure everyone out there got it right. Why the hell, then, would the buzz-words on Madison Avenue still be 'user-generated'? When was the last time you saw truly captivating user-generated content worth coming back to over and over again? How many articles have been written about it? Everyone seems to say how dangerous it is, and how many pitfalls it has, but it still remains on the agenda. I would guess that not even half of the people who visit YouTube on a daily basis actually contribute. In fact very little user-generated content outside of fart-centered home videos gets much exposure. What everyone is looking for is professional quality humor and entertainment. The big hits are just good ol' video shorts - commercials that caught someone's attention: Honda Element (maybe little pinch), Rolling Rock Beer Ape, Burger King King, etc. Zipatoni, just like every other agency that has tried to jump on the bandwagon, has overthought it. They ran scared, not understanding that in order to catch an eye you need to lead and not follow. Advertising is about making trends, not following them. Subservient Chicken works because it was just so lame and ridiculous that it was funny. It wasn't funny to my grandmother, and I'm sure that Burger King corporate tried desperately to hide it from franchise owners before release; but the guys out there watching Cartoon Network, eating fast-food four times a week, and buying PSPs thought it was a hilarious break from writing their blogs. CPB did their research, trusted their gut, and listened to the tight-pants wearing, greasy-haired emo kid in creative/production who was listening to Snow Patrol and hating his Dad long before MTV told the world that it was cool to do that. Should Zipatoni apologize? Should any of those companies that are 'hiding' apologize. No way - let them hide behind their voicemail. The only people being hurt by this stuff are Sony and Zipatoni. It's pretty funny and elitist to think that some corporate blog, shilling bullshit, isn't obvious. Anyone over the age of 15 now-a-days knows a lot about advertising and the internet. In the end, Sony/Zipatoni just made the worst PR mistake out there, they wrote hype and believed it. Too bad the kids out there know what hype is now. - Kuehn, Madison, WI –Kurt Kuehn, Madison, WI
LonelyGirl15 was not rejected by the public once discovered—it's retained its popularity. lonelygirl15 still has about 70k subscribers, and bree's story is still going. that youtube property is not marketing; it's filmmaking.
also... "cyber sleuths?" really? –Patric King, Chicago, IL
What I don't understand is, when CP B execute logoless campaigns like subservient chicken and the mini cooper robots campaigns, which run logoless until revealed to be advertising, its hailed as 'cool'. When sony gets discovered its 'deception'. Is the line between the two merely how well its executed? –Nick Senior, Baltimore, MD
I won't make excuses for Sony, but I'm sure this action had a lot to do with the company's current financial troubles. Playstation, one of the last profitable brands in the Sony portfolio, is even now in jeopardy with the $300-per-unit revenue loss on Playstation 3s. The whole thing looks like a last-ditch effort by the fading giant to have its Playstation workhorse boost holiday sales figures a bit to assuage share holders. What a shame.

Also, I've heard of "splogs" (spam blog), but never "flogs." –Nate Winter, Chicago, IL
Al I can say is it's unfortunate they didn't take advantage of our apology service: http://www.adrants.com/2006/12/adrants-offers-marketers-fake-blog-apolog.php –Steve Hall,
The least Zipatoni and Sony could for damage control is to put up a page on alliwantforxmasisapsp.com to admit they messed up and say sorry. I suppose it is human and corporate nature to be quick to lie and fake things and slow to admit that they messed up once their lies and fakery have been exposed.

Sad for Sony to not realize what Zipatoni has done to Sony's brand image and the harm done to its future marketing campaign. –Kempton -, Calgary, AB
All of this it true but the question that remains is how long will it take for key players, whether they're on the agency or client side, to accept this. It seems that we're going to see these types of efforts for a while now, with fake campaigns being launched. I'd bet there's a lot of them out there right now that haven't been caught yet. And they may never will.

Sony's response was totally lame - not acknowledging the inappropriateness of its actions - and Zipatoni is hiding behind voicemail. At least Edelman came out and laid out how they'd address the issue. –Jonathan Trenn, Falls Church, VA
 
(Source: Advertising age) 
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 10 January 2007 )
 
< Prev
© 2008 MassoGroup